county news online
The Columbus Dispatch
Democrats watch their base shrink
By Thomas Suddes
Sunday, March 13, 2011

Two grim dates confront Ohio Democrats. The first was Nov. 2, when Republicans captured state government from top to bottom.

The other was last Wednesday, when newly released 2010 Census data revealed two Ohios - one, shrinking, in traditionally Democratic counties, and another Ohio, growing in population, and in traditionally Republican counties, such as:

• Greater Cleveland’s growth champion, Medina County.

• A constellation of Columbus suburbs.

• A four-county wedge (Butler, Greene, Warren and Clermont counties) between Dayton and Cincinnati.

Those numbers, plus GOP control of the board that will draw Ohio General Assembly districts, plus the looming defeat of public-employee unions by Statehouse Republicans, should suggest three plain facts to Ohio Democrats:

• The GOP will likely run the Ohio House and state Senate through 2022.

• Next year, President Barack Obama (unless Republicans run a wacko against him) and Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown (ditto) may face a very skeptical Ohio.

• Any General Assembly Democrat who tried to woo votes by appeasing suburban Ohio’s old-white-guy gun-nuts and gay-bashers was living in a political dream world.

You can’t ever satisfy those cranks, because to them - come what may - a Democrat is still a Democrat. So Ohio Democrats might as well act like meat-and-potato Democrats, not Ivy League “triangulators.” Even an Ohio kook can spot a phony.

That said, yes, Ohio voters can be Election Day contrarians. In 1988, Hamilton County, a reactionary swamp, backed re-election of liberal Democratic U.S. Sen. Howard Metzenbaum and rejected Metzenbaum’s GOP challenger, future Gov. George V. Voinovich. The folk wisdom was that Metzenbaum was seen as the little guy’s or gal’s protector in Washington. Brown may fit that niche in many Ohioans’ eyes.

One rationalization by Ohio Democrats about the fix they’re in is that Republican Gov. John Kasich, in unseating Democrat Ted Strickland last November, drew 49 percent of the statewide vote, Strickland, 47 percent. So, hey, Kasich’s win was really just a fluke, right?

But Kasich, head to head, against Strickland, leaving out third parties and write-ins, drew 51 percent of Ohio’s vote. In 2008, Barack Obama drew 52 percent of Ohio’s vote, head to head, and no one seems to think that was a fluke.

And in those Ohio counties where people are moving - aiming to buy houses and raise kids - Kasich ran far more strongly than he did statewide.

In Medina County, home of House Speaker William G. Batchelder, Kasich drew 61 percent of the county’s vote, head to head, against Strickland.

Similarly, such central Ohio counties as Delaware, Fairfield (Lancaster), Licking (Newark) and Union (Marysville) grew like weeds from 2000 to 2010. Kasich’s head-to-head margins against Strickland in those counties were 61 percent (Fairfield), 62 percent (Licking), 67 percent (Delaware) and 69 percent (Union).

And in the four-county Dayton-Cincinnati wedge, Kasich’s head-to-head leads over Strickland were 62 percent in Greene, 65 percent in Butler and 71 percent in Warren and Clermont.

In contrast, of six “fastest shrinking” counties listed in a Plain Dealer tabulation, Strickland carried four - Cuyahoga, Mahoning (Youngstown), Trumbull (Warren) and Jefferson (Steubenville). The others: Hamilton and Crawford (Bucyrus). As noted, Hamilton, politically, is a world all its own, a fact for which the rest of Ohio can be thankful. Crawford, like its best- known politico, Republican Supreme Court Justice Paul E. Pfeifer, is often a maverick.

Read it at the Columbus Dispatch


 
senior scribes

County News Online

is a Fundraiser for the Senior Scribes Scholarship Committee. All net profits go into a fund for Darke County Senior Scholarships
contact
Copyright © 2011 and design by cigs.kometweb.com