the bistro off broadway

Redstate
Faith, love, and children
By John Hayward
April 26th, 2013 

President Obama became the first sitting president to address Planned Parenthood on Friday.  Not surprisingly, he didn’t have anything to say about Kermit Gosnell, or the wave of medical emergencies at abortion clinics, or the sex-selection abortions Live Action discovered at Planned Parenthood.  Obama didn’t even use the word “abortion” in his speech.  Abortion is so wonderful that even the most strident abortion radical ever elected to the White House can’t bring himself to say the word. 

If the abortion industry didn’t enjoy the nearly religious devotion of the Left, it would be Occupy Wall Street’s favorite example of a big business that pays big bucks for political influence, so it can operate with ridiculously lax oversight, weak safety standards, and lavish subsidies.  Kermit Gosnell preyed relentlessly upon poor black women, while treating his assistants like sweat shop labor.  The excuses offered by Planned Parenthood when its staff is caught flaunting the law on undercover video are reminiscent of tobacco company executives trying to claim that smoking isn’t bad for you.  The Democrat Party has expressed a willingness to shut down the entire government to protect Planned Parenthood subsidies.  When a prominent charity, Susan G. Komen for the Cure, tried to decouple from Planned Parenthood, the response was straight out of “The Sopranos.”  You are required to fund this organization, and you are not allowed to stop.  They’ve got a lot of money, political clout, and media influence available to enforce that directive. 

“Planned Parenthood is not going anywhere,” Obama declared in his speech.  ”It’s not going anywhere today, it’s not going anywhere tomorrow.”  Well, of course not.  It’s a billion-dollar corporation with $90 million annual profits that gets over $540 million in taxpayer funding that spent $12 million on highly effective political action during the last election.  And really, as long as it’s a properly supervised business selling legal goods and services, there’s no reason it should “go anywhere.”  It just shouldn’t be propped up with funds extracted by the government from people who don’t support its activities, especially since much of the dissenters’ money is recycled into political activity against them. 

The abortion industry thrives politically by associating its politics with human identity.  Opposition to Planned Parenthood is caricatured as hatred of women, even when the corporation’s critics are themselves women.  That’s a neat trick, if you can pull it off: equating dissent with hatred.  It’s not easy to lose a debate, if you can establish those ground rules. 

And yet, the abortion lobby seems increasingly worried that they might be losing the national debate.  Some of the panic is artificial, and profitable, folding neatly into the “progressive” narrative favored by the liberals who have been taking America over the edge of a cliff.  ”The fact is, after decades of progress, there’s still those who want to turn back the clock to policies more suited to the 1950s than the 21st century,” warned Obama.  Haven’t liberals lately been telling us that we should return to the tax policies of the Fifties, because they were prosperous despite the high nominal tax rates that nobody actually paid?  Isn’t Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder, relentlessly determined to ensure the 21st century remains saddled with the voter identification systems of the 1950s? 

But with those little spurts of nostalgia out of the way, we’re back to the “progressive” ideology that insists the failed economic policies and social degeneration of the Left are inevitable and irreversible, so any attempt to change course is “turning back the clock.”  There is no reason to take this idea seriously.  ”Change” can move in many different directions, including the rediscovery of ideas we might realize were abandoned in error.  The modern era could be right about some things, wrong about others, and the same can be said of previous decades.  Why does anyone accept the notion that the only alternative to embracing every single “progressive” failure is hopping into a time machine and returning to the days of Ozzie and Harriet?  Let’s allow for the possibility that the past sixty years saw both triumphs and mistakes.  We are not cursed to live with the mistakes for eternity…

Read the rest of the article at Redstate

 


 
senior scribes
senior scribes

County News Online

is a Fundraiser for the Senior Scribes Scholarship Committee. All net profits go into a fund for Darke County Senior Scholarships
contact
Copyright © 2011 and design by cigs.kometweb.com