|
|
 |
|
The
views expressed
on this page are soley those of the author and do not
necessarily
represent the views of County News Online
|
 |
Federal News Radio
Donald Trump,
taxes & your job
By Mike Causey
October 6, 2016
What does the surprise revelation of GOP candidate Donald Trump’s 1995
tax returns mean to his campaign and, maybe, to you as a voter? Last
week, somebody sent three pages of his old tax return to The New York
Times. They show business losses of more than $800 million and raise
the possibility that he didn’t (quit legally) pay taxes for a decade or
more. So what, if anything, is in it for you as a voter-taxpayer-civil
servant?
One of the many questions is who sent the returns to the Times. And
why? And what, if anything, next?
This has been an election campaign like no other. The professionals
tell us that both of the major party candidates have the highest
negatives, ever!
If you work for the federal government you have a lot riding on the
election, which is just five weeks away. In addition to electing your
leader (POTUS) and commander-in-chief, you will also be picking your
CEO for at least the next four years. And he or she will pick the men
and women who run your department, administration or agency. And they
in turn will pick the 4,000 plus political appointees who will be your
direct bosses. Plus, you are very likely a taxpayer so you have a
stakeholder interest in the election and you probably fall into one of
three categories.
You will cast what you hope is a positive vote, pulling the lever or
punching the card for the candidate you like (love) the most.
You will cast an intentionally negative vote holding your nose and
voting for the least offensive (in your opinion) of the two major party
candidates.
You will vote for a third party candidate or skip the 2016 election.
What candidates will or won’t do to the government is always an issue.
It was assumed government would shrink under President Ronald Reagan,
but it grew. It was assumed it would grow under President Bill Clinton,
but it shrunk by more than a quarter million jobs through buyouts,
contracting out and some layoffs. All but one federal union supported
candidate Bill Clinton over incumbent President George. H.W. Bush.
Aside from accepting the endorsement of several major postal and
federal unions, candidate Hillary Clinton has had little to say about
specific changes she would make in the federal workforce. Candidate
Trump happily accepted the endorsement of the Border Patrol Council of
the American Federation of Government Employees union, although the
AFGE is backing Clinton.
At this point, one can surmise that the Trump campaign is wondering a
number of things. Like who mailed the copies of the tax returns to the
Times?
Did they come from some inside the Trump campaign (or from someone with
access to his financial records) who has a grudge against Trump?
Did they come from someone inside the IRS?
Did they come from inside the Trump campaign who, maybe, thinks the
limited leak would prove his business acumen?
We may never know from whence the leak came. Or why those particular
years were leaked. But IRS employees, at least some of them, might be a
little nervous. House Republicans have a long track record of
contracting out tax-collection services, and cutting the IRS budget.
Most recently they tried to impeach Director John Koskinen for his
alleged after-the-fact involvement /coverup?? in the tax-exempt status
of some conservative political groups.
Candidate Trump has spoken about making it easier to fire federal
workers and beefing up the Defense Department. And streamlining tax
laws. But he hasn’t launched into the anti-bureaucrat rhetoric of many
House Republicans.
A long-time IRS employee said the leaked tax returns could have come
from an inside-the-operation enemy of Trump, from someone in the IRS,
or from the Trump camp itself. He said a number of Trump’s returns are
still under audit and “I would hazard a guess” that officials in the
audit and enforcement wing of the IRS are looking to see if there was a
leak, and if so, by whom.
This could, like so many “scandals” on both sides, go away and be
replaced by a bigger revelation. But if politicians learn — or believe
— that the leak came from the government, the fallout could hurt
everybody in the government.
Read this and other articles at Federal News Radio
|
|
|
|
