|
 |
Tallying numbers of students in poverty poses challenge for lawmakers
Shawna De La Rosa
Oct. 18, 2019
Dive Brief:
Indiana lawmakers are looking for new ways to identify students living
in poverty after coming under fire for underestimating the number based
on new state measures put in place in 2015, Chalkbeat reports.
Under the new measures, students only qualified as low-income if they
were in foster care or if their families received food stamps or
welfare payments. The threshold means fewer students were considered to
be living in poverty and caused funding to drop in some schools.
Indiana is one of 11 states using federal programs to determine
poverty. Public recommendations for alternative measures included
counting students on Medicaid or whose families report income below a
certain amount on tax returns.
Dive Insight:
Identifying students living in poverty is a tricky equation for states
to solve. For years, the free and reduced-price lunch program was the
standard when it came to making this determination. Changes to this
system, however, increased the number of eligible students and made the
poverty measure less precise. It's further complicated when families
avoid signing up due to perceived stigmas.
Because of this, states are now using different techniques to determine
how many students are actually living in poverty. California and
Colorado, for example, collect alternative income forms every four
years. Many of the southern states, including Texas, Mississippi and
Alabama use an identified student percentage multiplier of 1.6.
However the information is collected, it’s critical for schools to
receive the funding needed to support those students. Studies show that
students living in poverty before they enter school have a more
difficult time catching up with their peers. A study by The Educational
Opportunity Project at Stanford University found that poverty impacts
students more than race.
But evidence suggests most states aren’t supporting poverty-stricken
districts and that a "vast majority" aren't spending enough for
students of those schools to achieve national average test scores.
Poverty is especially harmful to the youngest learners in pre-K. Giving
students at this level an opportunity to attend pre-K gives them a
significant advantage over those who don't attend a pre-K program.
Regardless of poverty in these groups, a study suggests that
neighborhoods have an impact as well.
|
|
|
|
