|
|
The
views expressed
on this page are soley those of the author and do not
necessarily
represent the views of County News Online
|
 |
Time to Fight Back
By Jana Kolling
There comes a time occasionally when a “tipping point” is reached and
something has to happen. It’s here. 26 people were killed
in Connecticut, and the media spent 2 weeks up there uncovering the
most gruesome details possible. All the usual leftwing suspects
go on their tiresome tirades about racism, hate, fear, guns and our
despicable nation. Now, any well-schooled conservative already
knows the ends to their means. Liberals MUST perpetuate racial
divisions, even where there is none, to keep the minority vote.
They MUST make people feel bad about slavery, they MUST make blacks
feel they are getting the shaft, and they MUST make it look like only
they can deliver a helpless people from oppression. My friends,
it’s time to expose this liberal ploy for what it is, A LIE.
To start, I have prepared a pop quiz. If you have Chris Matthew’s
number he can help you with the answers, otherwise you’re on your
own. Yes or no, do you consider the following to be racist?
A black kid is killed by a white/Hispanic man.
A black kid is killed by a black man.
A black ESPN commentator says RG3 is not black because he has a white
girlfriend and might be a republican.
A white owner fires a black quarterback.
A black owner fires a black quarterback.
Bill O’Reilly disagrees with Obama.
Black rappers call black women horrible names.
Sean Hannity condemns Eric Holder and Susan Rice.
Nancy Pelosi condemns Clarence Thomas.
A union mob destroys a black man’s hotdog stand in Michigan.
Chuck Schumer criticizes Condi Rice.
A Muslim guns down 13 white service members.
A black mob beats up a white kid.
If you’re a liberal, this quiz probably took longer. You’d have
to think about the political repercussions and how it promotes your
agenda. Their positions are so schizophrenic, they can’t even
explain them. But one thing’s for sure, conservatives are all
racist.
The Sandy Hook shooting started the usual outcry for gun control, and
once again Michael Moore blames white supremacy. But consider
this. In Chicago last year on one weekend alone 41 people were
shot and killed, mostly blacks. Did the media fly in? Did
Obama make a public statement? Chicago, which has some of the
strictest gun laws in the country, had over 500 homicides last
year. Have you ever heard of Heather Sutton, the 7-year-old black
girl killed by blacks in Chicago while selling candy? Me neither,
but Trayvon Martin became a household name. Yep, the New York
Times knew immediately how and why that happened.
Again, if you are a liberal reading this I apologize in advance
confusing you with facts. But here’s what’s going on in this
country.
From 1976 to 2005, whites were killed by whites 86% of the time, and
blacks were killed by blacks 94% of the time.
A 2007 report showed that around 8000 blacks are murdered annually,
with 93% being killed by other blacks.
Over a recent 13 year period, 100,000 blacks were killed by other
blacks.
Blacks make up 13% of the population, but over 50% of the murders.
Black on black crime is the real story, but the media and liberals
won’t touch it with a ten foot pole. This is a heartbreaking
situation about a constituency they claim to care about so deeply, so
what gives? It’s simple, these facts don’t promote the myth of
racial tensions and oppression they badly need to get not only the
black vote, but that of the guilt-ridden white voter. It screws
up their narrative that blacks are innocent victims, and undermines the
claim that white people are the problem. In fact, it shows that
blacks kill more whites than the other way around.
Democrats will quickly say that education is to blame for inner-city
crime. So how do they respond? By ensuring that blacks will
keep attending gutted, failing inner-city schools. More
indisputable facts:
45% of blacks drop out of high school, compared to 22% of whites.
Black high school graduates perform academically 4 years below whites.
Washington DC is 86% minority, with a 56% graduation rate.
Detroit has a 75% dropout rate, and Cleveland and Baltimore have 65%.
Inner-city schools are almost all run by Democrats.
With blacks almost entirely voting Democrat, shouldn’t they be
screaming from the rooftop about the dismal plight of their
community? More uncomfortable facts for liberals and their
hypocritical views:
The National Education Association has more political organizers than
the Democratic and Republican Committees combined.
Fortune magazine ranks the 32 million member NEA in the top 15 in
Washington’s “Power” list.
The NEA and the American Federation of Teachers gave $59 million in
campaign contributions, with 95% going to Democrats.
Union dues are automatically collected, handsome pensions and benefits
are returned, and lots of money and votes go back to the
politicians. A nice neat little Ponzi scheme, where everyone wins
except the student. Now, there are 2 arguments liberals will use
here. The first is that poverty is causing the problem. OK,
let’s put that one to bed now. The lack of a good education
CAUSES the poverty. That leaves one argument left, they need more
spending. Nope, try again:
The average per-pupil spending nationally is $10,905, a 4-fold increase
since 1961.
Between 1973 and 2008 the performance of 17-year-olds for NAEP math and
reading was unchanged.
According to the PISA, of 34 OECD countries evaluating 15-year-olds,
the US ranked 25th in math, 17th in Science, and 14th in reading.
Washington DC spends $16,408 per pupil, while scoring the lowest SATs
in the country.
Trenton, NJ spends $20,663 per student for a 41% graduation rate.
Camden, NJ spends $23,356 per student for a 39% graduation rate.
Detroit spends $16K per pupil, while 2011 8th graders scored the lowest
in the 40-year history for math.
In Illinois, it costs over $219 thousand to try to remove a bad teacher.
Between 2005 and 2011, California education professionals receiving
$100K pensions or more rose by 650%.
So Obama, being down for the cause, took some very important steps
following his inauguration. He shut down the voucher program in
DC for new students, ensuring they could not escape failing
schools. Despite the fact that the Education Department’s own
findings showed that the program increased graduation rates by 21%,
campaign contributions won out. And despite the fact that Obama
spends $64K annually on a private school for his kids, union lobbying
trumped black students in drug-ridden schools. Hell, even Al
Gore, who opposed vouchers, said “If I had a child in an inner-city
school, I would probably be for vouchers too”. You gotta wonder,
who’s keeping who on the plantation?
Surely blacks, in exchange for their votes, deserve better than a 28%
poverty rate and 15% unemployment? These stats are unreal, and
yet blacks are expected to tow the party lines no matter how bad it
gets. And God help the black person who decides to think for
himself. How ironic, the party of tolerance and free thought is
the same party that refers to them as “House Negros, and tokens”.
And no one does it better than the New York Times, with a recent
article condemning South Carolina’s newest black republican senator and
the milestone his arrival represents. These hypocrites may as
well take out a billboard that says, “We have a monopoly on black
people and you can’t have them”!
In the end, it’s the liberals who are racists. They can find
racial inequality in a baked potato, and have a dictionary of black
“code” words. But it’s their policies that are decimating the
black community, with a 73% birth rate to single mothers having a 47%
poverty rate. And who can forget Obama suggesting that
fathers should raise their kids? Jesse Jackson’s response wanting
to cut off Obama’s balls for “talking down to blacks” is just barely
more entertaining than Hillary doing her best black accent in
Alabama. Then there’s Harry Reid saying that Obama could get
elected because he was light-skinned with no Negro dialect. Who’s
talking down to blacks?
Another example of the left’s mission to create racism was when a black
girl accused 3 Duke LaCrosse players of rape. OMG, perfect!
Rich white boys rape a black girl, no need for a lawyer here.
Jesse Jackson arrived quivering with excitement, and offered the victim
a scholarship. Too good to be true? Not only was the girl
taking 4 different drugs, bipolar and lying, the DA withheld evidence
that disproved her case. The lead prosecutor was disbarred,
dammit maybe next time.
Doesn’t it seem strange that most of the people crying racism are not
black? They are white liberals. Just like the people
against war are not in the service or even have family serving, they
feel compelled to speak on behalf of others? How noble of
them. But isn’t there a term for people who project their own
image onto others? Folks, liberals are fixated on skin color and
hell-bent on making people so scared to be called racist that they just
let it go. And as for Michael Moore’s claim about violence and
unwarranted fear, where was he when the Occupy movement set fire to
ports, destroyed storefronts, and urinated on police cars? Or on
the flash mobs in Philadelphia? Note to liberals: We’re on to you
so keep talking, this is good stuff.
|
|
|
|
